“Section 39.4(3) of the CLRA addresses authorization of relocation and applies to interim motions such as the present one. It provides that, in determining whether to authorize the relocation of a child, the court shall take into account the best interests of the child in accordance with section 24 of the Act, as well as the following factors:
a. the reasons for the relocation;
b. the impact of the relocation on the child;
c. the amount of time spent with the child by each person who has parenting time or is an applicant for a parenting order with respect to the child, and the level of involvement in the child’s life of each of those persons;
d. whether the person who intends to relocate the child has complied with any applicable notice requirement under section 39.3 and any applicable Act, regulation, order, family arbitration award and agreement;
e. the existence of an order, family arbitration award or agreement that specifies the geographic area in which the child is to reside;
f. the reasonableness of the proposal of the person who intends to relocate the child to vary the exercise of decision-making responsibility, parenting time or contact, taking into consideration, among other things, the location of the new residence and the travel expenses; and
g. whether each person who has decision-making responsibility or parenting time or is an applicant for a parenting order with respect to the child has complied with their obligations under any applicable Act, regulation, order, family arbitration award or agreement, and the likelihood of future compliance.