“The court is reluctant to interfere in a situation where the parties have purported to conclusively settle their financial issues: see Quinn v. Epstein Cole LLP, 2008 ONCA 662, 92 O.R. (3d) 1 at paras. 3-4. In this case, the parties’ Agreement specifically states in para. 7 that it is “in full and final satisfaction” of all outstanding claims between the parties, and acknowledges in para. 10.10 that the appellant and respondent “have sufficiently disclosed their income, assets and other liabilities existing at separation and the date of this Agreement”. In these circumstances, even if there was non-disclosure it was not material.”