“The four-part test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal is set out in R. v. Palmer, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759 at 775:
▪ The evidence should not be admitted if, through reasonable due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial.
▪ The evidence must be relevant to a decisive or potentially decisive issue.
▪ The evidence must be credible, or reasonably capable of belief.
▪ The evidence must be such that, if believed and considered along with all the other evidence, it could have affected the result at trial.”