“It has long been the law in Ontario that a person in the shoes of the Applicant has an onus to demonstrate that she is likely to receive an equalization payment that has some relation to the value of the assets that are the subject of the preservation order being sought. Lasch v. Lasch, 1988 CanLII 4581 (ON SC), [1988] O.J. No. 488 (Ont. H.C.J.).”

You consistently provide useful information in this Court Calendar. I ask our associates to read the cases you summarize, as I do. All the best.