“Accordingly, my conclusion is that this matter must proceed to a focussed Motion to Change which will review the Final Order in light of what has transpired in the past two years. I have already expressed my view to the parties that the contempt motion process is not to be used as a Motion to Change. It is not for this court to start tinkering with the Final Order despite the fact that the record before the court provides ample evidence for a judge to proceed with the Motion to Change.
In the meantime, the Applicant’s conduct and contemptuous behaviour merits a finding that it is not in the child`s best interest that the Applicant move on to Stage 2 of the parenting time provisions of the Final Order. His contemptuous behaviour and obvious desire to undermine the Respondent’s role as the decision-making parent must be considered in a Motion to Change prior to the Applicant having unsupervised parenting time.”